here early next month
Somebody should upload some detail comparison screenshots because I've seen both and they all look the same to me.To my eyes, trysync is never worth it if you care for 15khz the most..what I have learned so far.. buy 15khz cab for 15khz games, Naomi trysync, TTX2 H widescreen Vewlix, TTX2 V and a few H 4:3 at 480p trysync cabs. I have not seen a UVC downscale from 480p to 240p with my own eyes but I am looking forward to that and maybe all we need is 15khz cabs, UVC and a Vewlix
I have not seen a UVC downscale from 480p to 240p with my own eyes but I am looking forward to that and maybe all we need is 15khz cabs, UVC and a Vewlix
Why would you not want to play a game in its native resolution?
Take Naomi for example... If you set the Naomi to 15khz it will display/use some (game dependent) interlaced (480i) screens.I have not seen a UVC downscale from 480p to 240p with my own eyes but I am looking forward to that and maybe all we need is 15khz cabs, UVC and a VewlixWhy would you not want to play a game in its native resolution?
Now I'm wondering if this will remove the pixelation with games like CVS1/2 where the characters sprites are upscaled to 480p instead of display them on native 240p.Take Naomi for example... If you set the Naomi to 15khz it will display/use some (game dependent) interlaced (480i) screens.However if you set that same Naomi to 31khz (480p) and use a UVC to downscale that, it will remain 100% progressive (240p).I have not seen a UVC downscale from 480p to 240p with my own eyes but I am looking forward to that and maybe all we need is 15khz cabs, UVC and a VewlixWhy would you not want to play a game in its native resolution?
Naomi actually looks better via UVC on a 15khz CRT than directly connected in 15khz mode itself.
Interlaced video modes are TRASH!
it doesn't. The problem is that the sprites are low resolution and scaled up, not that the game is low resolution and scaled up. So it actually tends to look worse (IMO) because it's like taking a low res photo, blowing it up and then shrinking it back down again; you lose detail every time it's scaled no matter which way you're going.
Given how arcade perfect the Dreamcast release is, but with the convenience of home console options like training and easy versus modes etc for me that's pretty much the best version.
There's no CvS2 port for ps1. I'm talking about CVS1 and if you haven't seen it you should because it looks stunning. The Dreamcast and Naomi version doesn't look the same since the sprites are upsacaled to 480p and hence look blocky but the ps1 version is 240p the sprites look like they should but yeah the loading screens and being a port it can't compare to the arcade version.Yea man, I mean I've never seen this PS1 port but... A port can never be better than the source material, the game was released on Naomi and so nothing will ever top that release. See the Highlander Theroy thread for more details.
I know what your saying but the ps1 version it doesn't look to me at least that suffers from this problem. I did these test on 2 Sony pvm and bvm monitors that I own with rgb cables. When I finally got the naomi I was disappointed it didn't look the same(also test on the same monitors) then I found out the naomi doesn't support 240p resolutions. CVS on Naomi pretty much looks the same that CvS2 on any platform. Which is funny to me the ps1 port outputs the best picture out all even better than the original naomi version
Watch this video and I'm 100% sure you will take back that statement. PS1 version is nowhere near the Dreamcast or Naomi. It's missing a lot of animations and the loading times make the game worse IMO. The Naomi arcade board is basically a Dreamcast but contains more RAM. That why the Dreamcast versions of CvS1, CvS2, MvC1, MvC2 etc are all arcade perfect ports.
