I had to bodge together a monitor because we have a convention coming up soon and two of the cabinets my friends recently purchased had tubes that some operator swapped out for nearly dead ones before sale. I learned quite a lot during this so figured I would share since I know it will help someone in their search.
I could not achieve full raster width when I bolted the K7400 chassis up to a good U2000 tube and yoke, which according to everyone on the internet should work with a K7400 chassis. However according to a technical bulletin from WG, there are actually certain models of U2000 and K7000 yokes that are officially supposed to require swap when retrofitted with a K7400 chassis. Additionally I got a 25" RCA TV from a local friend, and when I hooked up the K7400 to this new tube the raster did not fill the screen vertically or horizontally, despite the yoke being fairly close to the original inductance and resistance specs. There was about an inch of empty space on every side of the raster which I needed to find a solution to.
Through comparing the differences of the half dozen K7400 and K7500 chassis I had available, I quickly realized that WG themselves made lots of factory changes to match the particular tubes and yokes shipped with each monitor.
To increase the horizontal size, I referred back to the K7500 manual which describes the horizontal sweep circuit theory. Some posts online say that C722 can be changed to a lower value to increase the width, which is partially true because this is actually the S Correction cap, responsible for horizontal linearity along with the coil. Changing this will affect your linearity which in my case was already fine so I didn't want to change that. In case you ever want to adjust the linearity though, a smaller cap in C722 will shrink the middle and expand the sides. To increase raster width in the "correct" way, we can see in the theory guide that C718 and C723 are responsible for setting the retrace sweep time. Looking at 3 different K7400 chassis I have, every single one has a different value C718 ranging from 470pf to 1200pf so I increased the size of C718 to a 820pf 1.6kv cap (what I had handy) and was able to fill the screen. Try this if you have a K7400 and can't quite fill the width with your particular yoke.
Additionally, I had been trying to figure out why the image on the TV tube was so dim, despite having low hours and showing excellent on the rejuvenator. I checked R811 and R310 which are the common culprits and both were good. I replaced the filament current limiting resistor R500 on the neck board with a wire link which helped but it still felt dimmer than it should be. Turns out another factory mod WG did was changing a second filament current limiting resistor at R823--each chassis I checked had a different value ranging from 1ohm to 3ohm, and the chassis currently had a 1.6ohm installed. I replaced it with a 1.2ohm I had handy and the monitor now had excellent contrast as expected.
With a good tube, your neck board pots should all be set to about a quarter turn from minimum. Your sub contrast and contrast pots should both be set to the middle. If you need to turn either of these down more than a small amount to stop blue from bleeding to the right (blue has a fixed drive value on the K7400 which is why I am using it as a reference), then you have used too small of a resistor value and are over-driving the filament. If you need to turn these up a lot to achieve good contrast then you need to try a lower value resistor.
The moral of the story here is that not all of these chassis are identical.
Vertical size was an easy mod: The height pot on the remote board is a 200k pot that sits between R630 and R623, and decreases the size as the resistance increases. I reduced the value of R630 to 10kohm and was able to fill the screen.
I then installed the chassis for the final time and randomly lost sync. Found Q601 shorted, replaced to fix. Chassis ran for a few hours with no problems.