I've been thinking if people are really satisfied with the FPGA implementation on the CPS1. It's a digital implementation that runs code and transforms sound data. The data is the same and the code run is the same, so actually it does the same as the Qsound chip, but it's in an FPGA. There is an option that I'd like to investigate and that's running the same code on a WE-DSP16A chip, which is the chip that hides behind Qsound, so people have a feeling more that it's like the original. What do you guys think? Would that be more compelling to you? Or it wouldnt make any difference at all?
Please let me know your thoughts.
These are DPS16A chips. Exact same chip, but they run different code.
Please let me know your thoughts.
These are DPS16A chips. Exact same chip, but they run different code.